Skip to main content

Loading...

Behavioral Insights

A curated archive of weekly behavioral science insights drawn from research and practice.

01

Loss Aversion

Losses loom larger than gains.

People feel the pain of losing something roughly twice as intensely as the pleasure of gaining the equivalent thing, leading to risk-averse behavior.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk'. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
02

The Default Effect

The path of least resistance is the path most traveled.

When a choice is pre-selected, people tend to stick with it because changing requires cognitive effort and deviates from the perceived recommendation.

Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). 'Do Defaults Save Lives?'. Science, 302(5649), 1338-1339.
03

Social Proof

We look to others to determine correct behavior.

In ambiguous situations, individuals assume the actions of others reflect the correct behavior, driving conformity and herd mentality.

Cialdini, R. B. (1984). 'Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion'. HarperCollins.
04

The Anchoring Effect

Initial information biases all subsequent judgments.

People rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the 'anchor') when making decisions, even if the anchor is irrelevant.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). 'Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases'. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
05

The Peak-End Rule

Memories are defined by highlights and endings, not averages.

People judge an experience largely based on how they felt at its peak (most intense point) and at its end, rather than the total sum or average of every moment.

Kahneman, D., et al. (1993). 'When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End'. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405.
06

Hyperbolic Discounting

We prefer smaller, immediate rewards over larger, later ones.

Valuations fall rapidly for small delay periods, meaning people consistently choose immediate gratification over long-term benefits, affecting savings and health.

Laibson, D. (1997). 'Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-477.
07

The Endowment Effect

Ownership instantly increases perceived value.

People ascribe more value to things merely because they own them, creating a barrier to trading or selling.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). 'Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem'. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348.
08

The Availability Heuristic

If we can recall it easily, we think it happens frequently.

People judge the probability of events by how easily examples come to mind, often leading to an overestimation of rare but dramatic events.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). 'Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability'. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.
09

Confirmation Bias

We see what we want to see.

The tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). 'Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises'. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
10

The Decoy Effect

A third, inferior option changes the preference between two others.

Consumers will tend to have a specific change in preference between two options when also presented with a third option that is asymmetrically dominated.

Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). 'Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis'. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 90-98.
11

Implementation Intentions

Planning 'when' and 'where' bridges the gap between goal and action.

Forming simple 'If-Then' plans (e.g., 'If it is 5pm, then I will run') significantly increases the likelihood of goal attainment by automating the response to cues.

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). 'Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans'. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
12

The Mere Exposure Effect

Familiarity breeds liking.

People tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). 'Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1-27.
13

Reciprocity

We feel obliged to return favors.

People feel a strong social obligation to repay what another person has provided, even if the favor was uninvited.

Regan, D. T. (1971). 'Effects of a Favor and Liking on Compliance'. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(6), 627-639.
14

The Sunk Cost Fallacy

Throwing good money after bad.

Individuals continue a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money, effort), regardless of the current costs or benefits.

Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). 'The Psychology of Sunk Cost'. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124-140.
15

Choice Overload

Too many options can paralyze decision making.

While people claim to want more choice, presenting too many options can lead to anxiety, indecision, and lower satisfaction with the final choice.

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). 'When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006.
16

The Goal Gradient Effect

We run faster as we approach the finish line.

Motivation increases as people get closer to achieving a goal.

Hull, C. L. (1932). 'The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis and Maze Learning'. Psychological Review, 39(1), 25-43.
17

The Fresh Start Effect

New beginnings facilitate new behaviors.

Temporal landmarks (birthdays, New Years, Mondays) separate past failures from the current self, increasing motivation for aspirational behaviors.

Dai, H., Milkman, K. L., & Riis, J. (2014). 'The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior'. Management Science, 60(10), 2563-2582.
18

Inattentional Blindness

We miss what we aren't looking for.

The failure to notice a fully-visible, but unexpected object because attention was engaged on another task.

Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). 'Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events'. Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074.
19

The Ikea Effect

We love what we build.

Labor leads to love; people place a disproportionately high value on products they partially created.

Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). 'The IKEA Effect: When Labor Leads to Love'. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453-460.
20

Ego Depletion

Willpower is a limited resource that can be exhausted.

Self-control or willpower draws upon a limited pool of mental resources that can be used up, impairing subsequent self-control tasks.

Baumeister, R. F., et al. (1998). 'Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource?'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
21

The Licensing Effect

Being good gives us permission to be bad.

When people do something positive (like exercising), they often feel licensed to do something self-indulgent later (like eating junk food).

Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). 'Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice'. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.
22

Scarcity

We want what we might lose.

Opportunities seem more valuable to us when their availability is limited.

Cialdini, R. B. (1984). 'Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion'. HarperCollins.
23

The Zeigarnik Effect

Unfinished business stays on the mind.

People remember uncompleted or interrupted tasks better than completed tasks.

Zeigarnik, B. (1927). 'Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen'. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 1-85.
24

Mental Accounting

We treat money differently depending on where it came from.

Individuals categorize funds into different 'accounts' (e.g., salary vs. bonus), which affects how they spend it, violating the principle of fungibility.

Thaler, R. H. (1999). 'Mental Accounting Matters'. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(3), 183-206.
25

The Spotlight Effect

We think everyone is watching us.

People tend to overestimate how much others notice aspects of their appearance or behavior.

Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (2000). 'The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 211-222.
26

Temptation Bundling

Pairing 'wants' with 'shoulds' increases compliance.

Coupling instantly gratifying 'want' activities (e.g., listening to audiobooks) with 'should' behaviors (e.g., exercising) increases the likelihood of doing the latter.

Milkman, K. L., Minson, J. A., & Volpp, K. G. (2014). 'Holding the Hunger Games Hostage at the Gym: Evaluation of Temptation Bundling'. Management Science, 60(2), 283-299.
27

The Hot-Cold Empathy Gap

We underestimate the power of visceral states.

People have difficulty predicting how they will behave in a 'hot' state (angry, hungry, aroused) when they are currently in a 'cold' (calm) state.

Loewenstein, G. (2005). 'Hot-Cold Empathy Gaps and Medical Decision Making'. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S49-S56.
28

Framing Effect

It's not what you say, it's how you say it.

People react differently to a particular choice depending on whether it is presented as a loss or as a gain.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). 'The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice'. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
29

Ambiguity Aversion

Better the devil you know.

People prefer known risks over unknown risks (ambiguity), often avoiding options where the probability of the outcome is uncertain.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). 'Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643-669.
30

Identifying the Victim Effect

One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic.

People are more likely to offer help to a specific, identifiable victim than to a large, vaguely defined group with the same need.

Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). 'Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability'. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(1), 5-16.
31

Optimism Bias

It won't happen to me.

People tend to overestimate the likelihood of positive events and underestimate the likelihood of negative events happening to them.

Weinstein, N. D. (1980). 'Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806-820.
32

The Bystander Effect

The more people present, the less likely anyone helps.

Individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present due to diffusion of responsibility.

Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). 'Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377-383.
33

Overjustification Effect

Paying for passion kills the passion.

Offering an extrinsic reward for an already intrinsically rewarding activity can decrease a person's future intrinsic motivation to perform that activity.

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). 'Undermining Children's Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Reward'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.
34

Chunking

Breaking it down makes it stick.

The process of taking individual pieces of information and grouping them into larger units to improve memory retention and cognitive processing.

Miller, G. A. (1956). 'The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information'. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
35

Serial Position Effect

First and last matter most.

The tendency of a person to recall the first (primacy effect) and last items (recency effect) in a series best, and the middle items worst.

Murdock, B. B. (1962). 'The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall'. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(5), 482-488.
36

Negativity Bias

Bad is stronger than good.

Negative events or feedback have a greater psychological impact than neutral or positive things of equal intensity.

Baumeister, R. F., et al. (2001). 'Bad Is Stronger Than Good'. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
37

Status Quo Bias

Change is painful.

A preference for the current state of affairs; the current baseline is taken as a reference point, and any change from that baseline is perceived as a loss.

Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). 'Status Quo Bias in Decision Making'. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.
38

Dunning-Kruger Effect

We don't know what we don't know.

People with low ability at a task overestimate their ability because they lack the meta-cognitive skills to recognize their own incompetence.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). 'Unskilled and Unaware of It'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
39

The Gambler's Fallacy

Thinking the universe owes us a win.

The mistaken belief that if an event happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). 'Belief in the Law of Small Numbers'. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110.
40

Self-Herding

We follow our own past actions.

People infer their preferences by observing their own past behavior, leading them to repeat actions even if the original decision was arbitrary.

Ariely, D., & Norton, M. I. (2008). 'How Actions Create—Not Just Reveal—Preferences'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 13-16.
41

Halo Effect

One good trait implies others.

The tendency for positive impressions of a person in one area to positively influence one's opinion or feelings in other areas.

Thorndike, E. L. (1920). 'A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings'. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25-29.
42

Fluid Intelligence vs. Crystallized Intelligence

Problem solving vs. accumulated knowledge.

Fluid intelligence (solving new problems) peaks in early adulthood, while crystallized intelligence (accumulated knowledge) peaks later in life.

Cattell, R. B. (1963). 'Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence: A Critical Experiment'. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1-22.
43

Certainty Effect

We overvalue 100%.

People overweight outcomes that are considered certain relative to outcomes that are merely probable.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk'. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
44

Planning Fallacy

Everything takes longer than you think.

The tendency to underestimate the time, costs, and risks of future actions and at the same time overestimate the benefits of the same actions.

Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). 'Exploring the Planning Fallacy'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 366-381.
45

Zero-Risk Bias

We pay a premium for total safety.

The preference for reducing a small risk to zero over a greater reduction in a larger risk.

Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., & Huber, J. (1987). 'An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks'. RAND Journal of Economics, 18(4), 465-479.
46

Affect Heuristic

Gut feelings drive decisions.

A mental shortcut in which people make decisions that are heavily influenced by their current emotions.

Slovic, P., et al. (2007). 'The Affect Heuristic'. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333-1352.
47

Spacing Effect

Space it out to remember it better.

Learning is more effective when study sessions are spaced out over time rather than massed together (cramming).

Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). 'Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology'. Teachers College, Columbia University.
48

Pygmalion Effect

High expectations lead to high performance.

The phenomenon whereby higher expectations placed upon individuals lead to an increase in performance.

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). 'Pygmalion in the Classroom'. The Urban Review, 3(1), 16-20.
49

Paradox of Choice

Less is more.

Eliminating consumer choices can greatly reduce anxiety for shoppers and often leads to higher sales and satisfaction.

Schwartz, B. (2004). 'The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less'. Harper Perennial.
50

Habit Loops (Cue-Routine-Reward)

Habits are powered by triggers and rewards.

A habit consists of a cue (trigger), a routine (behavior), and a reward; understanding this loop is key to changing behavior.

Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). 'A New Look at Habits and the Habit-Goal Interface'. Psychological Review, 114(4), 843-863.